
The purpose of a site audit is to ensure that work is being carried out in compliance with quality standards and agreed contracts. It provides an independent and objective view of work progress and the current state of a construction site, identifying gaps and areas for improvement.
Audits can be conducted internally or by external parties (client, architect, general contractor, public agency, etc.), and the initiative for audits can come from a variety of stakeholders. It is therefore essential that site audits are managed and monitored: health and safety audits; financial and accounting audits; or simple progress or project audits.
Despite a diverse and varied typology of audits and actors, the processes for carrying out site audits are mostly the same and it is possible to identify 10 key stages.
1. Define the audit objectives
The first step is to determine the type of audit (health and safety, quality, project progress, etc.) and its main objectives. These must be measurable and quantifiable.
2. Create an inspection checklist
This step involves listing specific items or areas to inspect. For example, in a safety audit, this might include the use of PPE, equipment maintenance requirements, or the presence of warning signs.
For this type of inspection, site audit applications are a particularly effective lever for collecting and processing information in an optimal manner.
3. Determine the scope and sampling area
A site audit should not cover the entire site, as this could take too long. It is essential to narrow the scope of the audit and select specific sections of the site to audit. For large projects, the selected area must be sufficiently representative of the overall project.
4. Plan the audit and inform stakeholders
Although site audits should ideally be conducted unannounced to gain an accurate picture of the site's condition, notifying certain key personnel (e.g., the project manager or superintendent) a few hours in advance can help avoid disruptions and ensure that the necessary documentation is available.
5. Carry out the construction project audit
This step includes inspection, observation, and interaction with site personnel. The purpose of the site visit and field review is to observe the quality of workmanship, compliance with procedures, and worker skills, as well as to accurately record all findings.
Following the audit, auditors should then engage in discussions with key stakeholders about the inspection results. If possible, the site should be walked with them for a joint quality review and to gather their views on any identified quality issues or unmet expectations.
6. Review documentation and quality records
Next, the quality assurance and control (QA/QC) document review takes place at the project site office. This involves verifying that the files are complete, accurate, and properly filed to ensure compliance with internal and external standards (regulatory, partner, etc.).
7. Re-inspect previously completed work
An audit is of little use if taken independently; it is necessary to compare current observations with previous inspection reports, noting any discrepancies. This is to ensure that repairs or checklist items from previous inspections have been properly addressed. This follow-up of previous actions is at least as important as the current audit. Action plan items from previous audits should be reviewed to assess progress, track improvements, or identify recurring issues that may require additional attention.
8. Evaluate the on-site audit and prepare reports
This step involves documenting findings, analyzing results, and formulating actionable recommendations. The results of the construction project audit should be recorded in an accessible manner: observations, discrepancies, and notable points. Photographic evidence, statistics, or specific examples are a real asset in supporting the findings, which will serve as evidence in follow-up or other audits.
9. Analyze problems and identify root causes
The evaluation part is essential. It's necessary to identify the reasons why certain problems have arisen and determine whether there are underlying causes, such as inadequate training, complex procedures, or failure to comply with standards. Next, an action plan is developed to define steps for improvement, ensuring that the steps to be taken are clear, assignable, and measurable.
10. Communicate results and recommendations
Finally, the audit report and action plan should be presented to project management and relevant stakeholders to ensure a collaborative approach to resolving issues and improving site safety and quality.
Although some steps may seem more straightforward than others, digital solutions for construction project audits are facilitators and simplifiers. Construction site audits can be complex and time-consuming, especially when using paper or spreadsheets, which can double the workload, especially if photos must be uploaded as evidence. While the methodology, complexity, and redundancy inherent in these audits are inescapable, some tasks can be optimized, improved, and made simpler and more efficient through digitalization.
Tribune by Álvaro Vega, Regional Manager France, Spain, Italy and Latin America, PlanRadar (LinkedIn).