The merits of metrology in the implementation of effective measurement management
Admittedly, this is a late awakening, but for some time now, many companies have included measurement management in their procedures manual. To this end, a mastery of metrology and the way of piloting the measurement management system can positively influence the efficiency of a company, and allow a reduction in costs.
Conversely, neglecting the quantity of measurements performed, poor estimation of measurement uncertainties, non-mastery of calibration intervals and the production of erroneous and non-traceable measurements are some of the malfunctions that can be observed. These are all threats that can lead to financial losses for the company.
Both internal company laboratories and measurement service laboratories are affected by these risks. The sectors of activity in which this issue occupies a prominent place are as follows: construction, automotive, defense, health, the environment, agrifood, aeronautics, nuclear, pharmaceuticals, etc. .
A change in perception based on a host of reasons
A few years ago, metrology was seen not as a source of profit, but more as a pocket of expenses. But due to recent developments, more and more companies have revised their perspective on the issue. It appears after analysis that if it is well managed, metrology can allow your company to create new opportunities.
As they evolve, the ISO 9001 and 17025 standards lead companies to more responsibility and flexibility in terms of choice. The objective of these advances is to validate the measurement results and to continuously improve quality. It is therefore a question of controlling the metrology function and not of submitting to it.
On the other hand, the management of measuring instruments by companies is not the same as before. Awareness was raised gradually. From now on, metrological connections take into account three essential criteria: time, level and cost. The consideration given to each operation or decision must take into account not only its impact on the result of the measurement, but also on the quality of the product.
What difficulties does the metrology function face?
The observation made in most companies is that very often the person in charge of metrological questions does not really have academic training in this area. Of course, companies must face this paradox. Their ardent desire to set up a metrological service worthy of the name comes up against the lack of trained executives who can occupy positions of responsibility in this department.
The difficulty of finding a workforce specialized in this discipline is above all inherent in the absence of a real training course linked to this field in higher education. To fill this gap, it is related profiles who are often appointed to fill the positions available for managers. Generally, it is the QHSE manager who combines these functions.
It could also be an advanced metrology technician or a laboratory manager. It is therefore true self-taught, trained on the job, who are responsible for piloting the metrology function, quite a challenge. The consequences of these shortcomings are manifold both for those responsible for metrology called upon to demonstrate competence only for the company.
Training, the keystone of better performance for companies and managers
Training is the best way for you to occupy the position of metrology manager and acquire the related skills. In addition to mastering the measurement processes, you will be able to optimally manage the measurement management system. To achieve this, a number of objectives must be achieved.
First, you must make the results of your measurements reliable. Complying with the requirements of ISO 10012 and improving decision-making are the main expectations of companies in relation to the results of measurements. This is why the measurements you produce must be not only actionable but without any ambiguity.
Second, you must popularize and ensure the application of good practices concerning the management of measurement in your company. In this case, the term “good practices” refers to mastery of the subject, rigor, transmission capacity and finally, mastery of the basics of metrology.